Internet Advertising Placement Using APT Strategies
Australian Online Readership Survey:
A worked example
1. INTRODUCTION
APT
Strategies Australian Online Readership Survey allows media
buyers to plan an internet advertising schedule that will yield
the best value for money or return on investment. This document
demonstrates the potential savings in using a well-planned approach
by way of a worked example.
2. THE
PROBLEM
The
client has a new product for women aged between 18 and 44 and
wants to promote it through PAY-TV and the Internet with an emphasis
on reach over frequency.
3. THE
SOLUTION
The
first step is to determine which internet properties have a higher
proportion of visitors who are Women aged 18-44, and given the
emphasis on reach over frequency, who are also NON PAY-TV subscribers.
We
can compare 84 internet properties on this criteria, but for this
example, we focus on fifteen of the largest Australian web-sites
for the sake of brevity.
We
find that the percentage of visitors in the past month who meet
the criteria is as follows:
| [Figure
1] |
TOTAL |
Females
18-44 - No Pay TV |
| TOTAL
Respondents |
13114
100%
|
2584
20%
|
| LookSmart |
100%
|
24%
|
| Fairfax
at Market |
100%
|
23%
|
| NineMSN |
100%
|
21%
|
| Yellow
Pages |
100%
|
21%
|
| Sydney
Morning Herald |
100%
|
20%
|
| Alta
Vista Australasia |
100%
|
20%
|
| eXcite |
100%
|
20%
|
| White
Pages |
100%
|
20%
|
| Yahoo |
100%
|
20%
|
| The
Age |
100%
|
19%
|
| Anzwers |
100%
|
19%
|
| News.com.au |
100%
|
17%
|
| Trading
Post |
100%
|
17%
|
| Australian
Financial Review |
100%
|
15%
|
| Aust.
Stock Exchange |
100%
|
13%
|
We
could conclude from the table above that if each of the web-sites
were charging the same CPM (cost per thousand impressions) that
the best value would be accomplished by advertising with the over-achievers
in our target, namely LookSmart, Fairfax at Market, NineMSN and
Yellow Pages. However, different properties do charge different
CPMs, and of course package deals are available, so it is suggested
that a spreadsheet is setup with the actual cost to you
included, so that value judgments can be made easily.
The
spreadsheet would look like the table below, with the hypothetical
$50 per thousand impressions for each site replaced with the prevailing
CPMs.
| [Figure
2] |
TOTAL |
Females
18-44 - No Pay TV |
CPM |
Effective
CPM |
| LookSmart |
100%
|
24%
|
$50
|
$208
|
| Fairfax
at Market |
100%
|
23%
|
$50
|
$217
|
| NineMSN |
100%
|
21%
|
$50
|
$238
|
| Yellow
Pages |
100%
|
21%
|
$50
|
$238
|
| Sydney
Morning Herald |
100%
|
20%
|
$50
|
$250
|
| Alta
Vista Australasia |
100%
|
20%
|
$50
|
$250
|
| eXcite |
100%
|
20%
|
$50
|
$250
|
| White
Pages |
100%
|
20%
|
$50
|
$250
|
| Yahoo |
100%
|
20%
|
$50
|
$250
|
| The
Age |
100%
|
19%
|
$50
|
$263
|
| Anzwers |
100%
|
19%
|
$50
|
$263
|
| News.com.au |
100%
|
17%
|
$50
|
$294
|
| Trading
Post |
100%
|
17%
|
$50
|
$294
|
| Australian
Financial Review |
100%
|
15%
|
$50
|
$333
|
| Aust.
Stock Exchange |
100%
|
13%
|
$50
|
$385
|
By
following these steps alone, value would be assured.
However, even further refinement is possible using APT Strategies
data.
4. FREQUENCY
& DUPLICATION
4a. Frequency
For the purposes of further analysis well assume that the
four over-achieving web-sites in our example are the best value
buys and focus on them.
Females aged 18-44 with No PAY-TV access these sites at the following
rate per month (i.e. of those who access each site at all):
| [Figure
3] |
Frequency |
| LookSmart |
6.4
|
| Fairfax
at Market |
10.8
|
| NineMSN |
8.6
|
| Yellow
Pages |
7.6
|
Based
on the table above, if reach (over frequency) was required, the
rotation requested from the publisher would be less
for Fairfax at Market as this has the highest frequency
of visits amongst visitors. For the other three, with visits per
month in the 6-8 band, which is around the average, the normal
rotation would be accepted.
The
publishers of course have access to their own census
results, and these should be made available to advertising agencies
and used in conjunction with the sample results. Our research
shows very different frequencies between the web-sites of print
weeklies and print dailies as one might expect.
The media planner will always bear in mind the difference between
a surfing or casual site (e.g. Australian
Wine Online) and an application or frequent
site (e.g. ASX or SMH).
4b. Duplication
Having
decided on these four sites, we now look at the duplication of
viewer-ship amongst our target group.
These
four sites would reach 72% of our internet target market. Looking
now at the how that is made up we see that more that 50% visit
ONLY ONE of our four sites in a month:
|
|
Exclusive
Readership
|
|
|
LookSmart
|
10.4%
|
Single
51.4%
|
|
Fairfax
at Market
|
5.6%
|
|
NineMSN
|
17.4%
|
|
Yellow
Pages
|
18.0%
|
|
LS-F@M
|
0.8%
|
Two
only
33.1%
|
|
LS-9MSN
|
5.6%
|
|
LS-YP
|
5.0%
|
|
F@M-9MSN
|
4.4%
|
|
F@M-YP
|
6.2%
|
|
9MSN-YP
|
11.1%
|
|
LS-F@M-9MSN
|
1.9%
|
Three
only
13.9%
|
|
LS-F@M-YP
|
1.7%
|
|
LS-9MSN-YP
|
6.6%
|
|
F@M-9MSN-YP
|
3.7%
|
|
LS-F@M-9MSN-YP
|
1.5%
|
All
4
1.5%
|
Again,
with reach being dominant over frequency, we see that we should
focus on Yellow Pages, NineMSN and LookSmart over Fairfax at Market
to reach our target group.
|